The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Ethics Statement
Recent Issues
Online First
Volume 1, Issue 1

All submitted manuscripts are subject to peer-review and are expected to meet standards of academic excellence. The Canadian Journal of Applied Mathematics (CJAM) has a single blind peer-review process in which the reviewers know who the authors of the manuscript are, but the authors do not have access to the information on who the peer reviewers are. The factors that are taken into account in review are correctness, significance, originality and readability. Articles may be rejected without review if the Editor considers the article obviously not suitable for publication. With the help of the reviewers’ comments, CJAM’s decision (accepted or accepted with minor revision or accepted with major revision or rejected) will be sent to the corresponding author. Reviewers are asked if they would like to review a revised version of the manuscript. The editorial board of the CJAM is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the CJAM should be published. In detail, the CJAM complies with the International Mathematical Union's Committee for Electronic Information Communication (CEIC) Recommendations on Information and Communication: Best Current Practices for Journals (endorsed by the IMU General Assembly 16 August 2010).